Re: OT:Sie existieren!!

[ Zauberspiegel Wissenschaft Ideenfabrik ]

Geschrieben von Gast am 12. April 2006 12:36:51:

Als Antwort auf: Re: OT:Sie existieren!! geschrieben von tina am 12. April 2006 02:10:43:

>Nein, bitte um entsprechende(Link)-Hinweise.

Die Pajak betreffenden Seiten sind nur noch über archive.org zugänglich, die erste (020914) kann ich dort schon nicht mehr finden. Der Index ist hier. Vielleicht gibt es weitere Fundstellen, suchen nach 'cassiopaean transcripts' und nachsehen, ob sessions nach 2000 enthalten sind.

Dies sind die relevanten Passagen:

2002-09-14

(A) Well, let's first try to ask about this Polish guy Pajak who, in the 80's, had a plan for what he calls magno-craft, a propulsion system for UFO's.  Later, he improved it, and acquired a supporter.  But there are some strange phenomena around him recently, especially after he was contacted by a woman who is a former Miss Italy.  She received some kind of communication for plans to build telepathic pyramids...
A: Co-opted so as not to get any closer.
Q: (A) Can his machine propulsion - his magno-craft - be made to work?
A: Not as published.

2002-09-28

Q: (A) I am reading one of the books by the Polish engineer Pajak, written in 1990, where he describes a UFO propulsion system. He claims that he has discovered a "periodic principle" where inventions come like the periodic table, and he says it is now time to discover this UFO propulsion system. So much that he says seems to "fit." He gives many good ideas, but generally for the wrong reasons. Are his main ideas sound? Is it true that UFOs are using the machinery that he describes?
A: His primary block is his lack of knowledge of hyperdimensional physics.
Q: (A) That is true. But to build such a thing, we need to use 3D technology because that is what we have. We cannot use 4D technology because we don't have access to 4D tools, so what can we do?
A: You will.
Q: (A) Question is whether Pajak's 3D technology that he describes corresponds to what it really is?
A: Generally speaking, more or less. But so much is lacking that, as designed, the prototypes will do nothing.
Q: (A) Has his idea been taken from him and successfully implemented by others - say, military?
A: No need. Only objective there is to prevent his further discoveries.
Q: (A) His ideas are quite original, so I wonder where he is getting them?
A: Not so original, just logical. Only reason others don't "get" such ideas is because they cannot think logically due to hypnosis.
Q: (A) Well, I also have problems with logical thinking due to hypnosis!
A: Less than before.
Q: (A) Well, that means that I am still under hypnosis and clearly I am under more hypnosis than this Mr. Pajak is because I have not been able to get as far as he has...
A: You aren't an engineer.
[..]
Q: (L) What about some of these UFO detectors this guy Pajak has talked about?
A: Most of that is nonsense. UFOs can easily overcome any such devices.
Q: (L) In reading the Pajak story, there is a part of it written by a former Miss Italy who claims that she had information from some sort of "contact" - maybe extraterrestrials or something - about how to build a "telepathic communication pyramid." Is it something that would do what was claimed about it?
A: To some extent, thought not in the way desired. It provides a medium of reception of "earth bound" discarnates. It other words, it is about as useful as trying to "remote view" 4th density from a 3rd density state of being.

(A) = Arkadiusz Jadczyk, (L) = Laura Knight-Jadczyk, http://quantumfuture.net

Übrigens können die transcripts auch eine Quelle der Inspiration sein für Leute, die sich mit 'advanced physics' beschäftigen, so wie (A) das tut.

Ein kurzer Ausschnitt aus 1998-08-22:

Q: ... (A) I have a question about UFT. A piece from Einstein's biography says that in 1931, Einstein and Mayer re-formulated Kaluza five dimensional theory, retaining a four-dimensional space-time. I would like to know if it was a step back or a step forward when they did this?
A: Step back, then forward.
Q: (L) The paper was a step back and then they stepped forward in secret?
A: Close.
Q: (A) Next question: three weeks ago you mentioned in relation to UFT pentagons and hexagons. I have here a pentagon and a mathematical formula under pentagon which for me, relates to a pentagon, and it has x, y, z, three dimension; time, which is one dimension, and perhaps the fifth dimension, which corresponds to the fifth. Is this association of pentagon with this mathematical symbol below correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) I want to ask if you ever told us to do something with a Tesla coil which I failed to record or got lost somewhere?
A: Maybe. Gravity waves, pentagon is the foundation; hexagon is the conclusion.
Q: (A) I want to go back to this little mathematical formula here. I have here a plus or minus and I don't know which sign to take in front of this field variable. Should it be plus like x, y and z, or should it be minus, like with t?
A: Minus.
Q: (A) Related to these gravity waves, in 1936 Einstein wrote a paper which was rejected, in which he claims to have discovered that there are no gravity waves. When you talk...
A: Cloak for others. Einstein knew differently, but was forced to comply for political and security reasons.
Q: (A) Should gravity be quantized as other fields?
A: It can be.
Q: (A) But, if it is quantized, it will be gravitons, and you said that there are no gravitons...
A: Gravitons are really electrons within a time vacuum.
Q: (A) Physicists today and for the past 5 or 10 years have been trying to build a theory of everything which is built on the idea of strings - that everything is composed of oscillating strings - they call it SuperString Theory. Is the idea of strings any good?
A: No.


Antworten:

[ Zauberspiegel Wissenschaft Ideenfabrik ]